Jeffrey Wilens obsession suing Storage Companies

More examples of Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center acting like a Narcissist who cannot stop making up class action cases no matter how many times he has lost before.

He is not only using unethical techniques, he also continuously attempts to defraud the court by filling bogus cases with fabricated allegations.

Jeffrey Wilens is also cheating on his court fees, see in case #1, where his fees were reduces to only 10% of the original fees he requested.

1. Worley v. Storage USA, Inc. Filed 12/21/09 .
Jeffrey Wilens lost the appeal filed on May 20, 2011
The court made determination that the case had been “over-litigated” by Jeffrey Wilens just for the purpose of milking his fees from the case. The court order resulted from the inflated billing by Jeffrey Wilens, reduced the amount requested by Jeffrey Wilens from $266,221 to $26,543.

Read the order: Jeffrey Wilens lost on the appeal and court order for Wilens to pay Storage USA costs on the appeal. More about Jeffrey Wilens lost on class action appeal.

After losing in court trying to obtain his inflated fees, Jeffrey Wilens continued to obsessively persue storage facilities.

Next, Jeffrey Wilens continued to file 3 more cases against Extra Space Storage.

2. John Mahoney v. Extra Space Storage – Please read the link and decide for yourself if this is a“concocted case” whereby the “Plaintiff” John Mahoney rented “an entire storage unit” in order to store a handful of $100 worth of CDs. (Imagine a whole storage unit with a bag containing some old CD’s in it) Than John Mahoney does not pay the rent for the second and third month, ignores and does not reply to phone calls and mail reminding him to pay and informing him that per the agreement he signed his CDs are about to be auctioned. Couple months later Jeffrey Wilens files a class action for violating the California Self-Service Storage Facility Act, with John Mahoney as the lead plaintiff.

Here you can see Jeffrey Wilens lost and also lost the appeal court’s order denying Jeffrey Wilens class certification   Mahoney v. Extra Space Storage Filed 9/26/13

3. Tiffany Curtis v. Extra Space Storage Inc., et al., Case No. 3:12-cv-00319
Here Judge Stops Extra Space Storage Class Action Lawsuit, once again Jeffrey Wilens Lost Class Action Lawsuit

Still not giving-up on his obsession Jeffrey Wilens filed On 12/10/2012 a 4th Class Action Lawsuit.

4. Martinez v. Extra Space Storage 3:2013-cv-00319 380 01/23/2013 
Once again Jeffrey Wilens Lost on Class Action Lawsuit certification.

Read more how Jeffrey Wilens Lost on Class Action Scam

02/25/2014 Jeffrey Wilens ordered by the Court to pay $10,813 for failure to produce his plaintiff Teresa Ann Martinez for a deposition.  Apparently Teresa Ann Martinez could not take it anymore being involved with Jeffrey Wilens scam and decided not to cooperate with him anymore.

More on this case Martinez v. Extra Space Storage, order for Jeffrey Wilens to stop plaintiffs Solicitation and return produced documents after Jeffrey Wilens violated court protective order.

Beware, Don’t get involved with any of Jeffrey Wilens Class Action Lawsuits

Plaintiffs could potentially get have a judgment against them by the entities which are being sued by Jeffrey Wilens, just like in the case below of DirecTV. Jeffrey Wilens plaintiffs ordered to pay DirecTV $100,000. The judge awarded plaintiffs to pay attorney’s fees to DirecTV, placing Wilens’ seven plaintiffs on the hook for about $100,000.Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center is a lawyer who was trained and experienced in the art of persuasion, and he may persuade you to do something that is against your best interest. Don’t listen to him. If you get a solicitation from Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center to be a member of his class action lawsuits. You need to know that lawyer solicitation for clients is a felony, this is the kind of crime that other lawyers went to jail for. Read More Here: http://www.classactionscams.com/jailed-lawyers/
In our opinion the way he is soliciting his plaintiffs, is barratry & Champerty and maintenance  which is considered to be a crime (Just like ambulance chasing). You don’t want to get involved and be a co-conspirator with Jeffrey Wilens and his conduct. Do yourself a favor and keep your life out of unnecessary headaches. You don’t want to get calls from the DA or Law Enforcement asking you what you have to do with Jeffrey Wilens. In fact, in the Hernandez v. Vitamin Shoppe Indus, Jeffrey Wilens was sanctioned for improperly soliciting class members http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1392173.html.
Read More About Dirty Class Action Lawyers and Class Action Scams: Top class-action lawyer to be indictedClass action lawsuits — legalized extortion

http://www.facesoflawsuitabuse.org/facts/ Facts – “Lawsuit abuse is having a devastating impact on our society.”

Class action or class extortion

Lawyers Destroying America

http://www.akdart.com/lawyers.html “Ambulance Chasing Lawyers and Frivolous Lawsuits” – Two big reasons for the high cost of… everything!

Frivolous And Class Action Lawsuits

“The class action game”

Ambulance Chasing Lawyers and Frivolous Lawsuits; list of lawyers get the millions, plaintiff the dollars”

“The class action extortion racket”

http://gloog.us/wordpress/2013/02/10/class-action-madness-continues/ “class action lawsuits – the crème de la crème for the American lawyer’s extortion racket”

Class-action lawsuit racket:  ”Unfortunately, that is how the class-action game is played across the country. First, trial lawyers work to convince the public that most corporations and business people are trying to rip off the consumer or shareholder. Then they accuse companies with “breaking the law” and wrongdoing, even though there’s no evidence or the “injury” is far-fetched or minuscule. If there is a lack of evidence, simply manufacture it. Next, get a lead plaintiff to serve as the front man for the suit. Finally, shake down the targeted company for a settlement that ensures that 100-thousands or multimillion-dollar attorneys’ fees are paid, but that class members get little or nothing.”

LA Times Article The case of the class-action con

Jeffrey Wilens was involed in litigation with DirecTV at least 17 times

Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center has been involved in heavy obsessive litigation with DirecTV.  We have listed below 17 cases that we know of but there may be more.

Jeffrey Wilens Class action execution reminds of a Serial killer’s Sociopath behavior. Jeffrey Wilens is so obsessed he never knows when to stop.  These cases are completely driven by what appears to be his own psychopathic hard-nosed self-interest and greed, and not the interest of the “victims” in his class action suits.

As far as we can find out,  Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center lost or never won in these cases just to show how he will never give up even though the reality proved to him that his actions are not worthy of pursuing but he is so driven as a typical narcissist that cannot let go.

1. McClelland v. DIRECTV, Inc., et al Colorado District Court, Case No. 1:04-cv-00435-REB-MJW – Jeffrey Wilens sued DirecTV for Racketeering the Lawsuit was dismissed by the Judge for failure to prosecute and to obey orders of this court.

2. Lawrence Freeman v. Directv Inc et al 2:2004-cv-02374 890 04/05/2004 07/13/2004

Frivolous class action against DirecTV dismissed by court and Jeffrey Wilens also lost the appeal 

3. Rod Sosa, et al v. Directv Inc, et al 2:2003-cv-05972 470 08/21/2003 12/03/2003 Class Action Jeffrey Wilens lost - Also Wilens of Lakeshor Law Center Lost on the appeal

The judge also awarded attorney’s fees to DirecTV, putting Wilens’ seven plaintiffs on the hook for a total of nearly $100,000 in law firm liabilities. Wilens’ plaintiffs ordered to pay DirecTV $100,000

4. Kevin Blanchard et al. v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al  BC284166 - Jeffrey Wilens Lost on the appeal
http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/caselaw/california-courts-of-appeal-cases/blanchard-et-al-v-directv-inc-et-al/

5. Fisher V DirecTV Filled 2004 in Los Angeles County Courthttp://www.securityfocus.com/news/8472

6. Directv Inc v. Rowland, et al 3:2003-cv-00911 890 05/07/2003 09/14/2004

7. Directv v. Scott Booth et al 2:2004-cv-02759 890 04/20/2004 03/22/2005

8. DirecTV Inc v. Neal Sullivan 8:2004-cv-00643 890 06/04/2004 04/15/2005

9. Peter Persano v. DIRECTV Inc et al 2:2005-cv-03732 370 05/19/2005
08/22/2005

10. Directv Inc v. Aryo Ehyaei, et al 2:2003-cv-03343 890 05/13/2003 07/22/2004

11. Directv Inc v. Charles Brownlee, et al 2:2003-cv-03625 890 05/21/2003
07/08/2003

12. Directv Inc v. Howard Wyche, et al 2:2003-cv-08573 890 11/25/2003 01/12/2005

13. Directv Inc v. George Trejo, et al 2:2003-cv-08578 890 11/25/2003 12/02/2004

14. Directv Inc v. Charles Brownlee, et al 8:2003-cv-01104 890 07/08/2003 11/30/2004

15. Directv Inc v. Phan 2:2004-cv-00537 890 01/27/2004 09/22/2004

16. DIRECTV, Inc. VS Deanna L. Depaoli, etal  2:03-cv-0058 Nevada

17. DIRECTV Inc v. Shaw, et al Arizona District Court, Case No. 2:04-cv-00504-HRH

http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8472 Read more about how Jeffrey Wilens Class action which reminds of a Serial killer’s Sociopath behavior starting in the headline “Multiple Lawsuits”.

Read more on the Wall street Journal

Jeffrey Wilens Narcissist

Jeffrey Wilens using his brother Gary Wilens as fake NetFlix class action objector

One more example how Jeffrey Wilens abuse the legal system and using the Wilens family in fake class action.

Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center used his brother Gary Wilens as an objector in NetFlix class action Case No. 5:11-cv-00379-EJD.  Jeffrey Wilens used his brother Gary Wilens to maliciously intervene as an “objector” in the NetFlix Class Action lawsuit and objected to the settlement for the purpose of harassment and extortion.

In declaration filled in this case Jeffrey Wilens was accused in making threats and “hold the settlement hostage”. “His decision to represent a family member suggests that, at the time he first with Class Counsel, he did not have a client despite his representations to the contrary” “Jeffrey Wilens has a long history of using improper tactics to file meritless objections on behalf of family members.”

Read the full court filled Declaration by Jay Edelson Esq. about Jeffrey Wilens misconduct

Jeffrey Wilens was playing the same dirty game before and “was sanctioned for improperly soliciting class members to opt-out of the settlement” in the Hernandez v. Vitamin Shoppe Indus, case.

 

Jeffrey Wilens used is mother Phyllis Wilens in another class action scam.

Wilens represented his mother Phyllis Wilens in another class action objection the Northern District Court Case Number: 12-16739 Vlaho Miletak, et al v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al. The court found his objections to be completely without merit improperly attempted to leverage the threat of an objection to obtain confidential discovery.

The case was eventually dismissed. Her is the Docket of Jeffrey Wilens and Phyllis Wilens ”objections”

Jeffrey Wilens acting like a bigshot, operating out of a PO Box at the UPS store

 

Jeffrey Wilens scam office is a UPS Post Box

Jeffrey Wilens fraud office is a UPS Post Box

This is the address Jeffrey Wilens uses on his Lakeshore Law Center Website and the one he uses everywhere on the internet as his official office address:

Jeffrey Wilens scam fake  office is a UPS Post Box

Jeffrey Wilens scam fake office is a UPS Post Box

How respectable could this Lakeshore law Center firm be?  You the reader be the judge

Class Action Lawyer Sentenced to Prison for Making up fake clients

Class Action Lawyer Sentenced to Prison for conduct that reminds of the practice that Jeffrey Wilens Lakeshore Law Center  use.

Read the LA Times Class Action Lawyer Sentenced to 2 years Prison

William S. Lerach, was sentenced Monday to two years in prison and ordered to forfeit $7.75 million for concealing illegal payments to a plaintiff in the class-action lawsuits for which the firm became famous and engaged in make payments to people to secure them as plaintiffs in their class action cases.

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters Prosecutors for the United States attorney’s office of the Central District of California, who worked on the case for seven years, say that Mr. Lerach and others lined up the plaintiffs ahead of time to gain an illegal advantage over other law firms engaged in the same suits.

By being designated the lead plaintiff, the law firm stood to reap a larger share of any eventual lawyers’ fees.

In his guilty plea, Mr. Lerach admitted to concealing from federal judges his secret payments to one such plaintiff, Dr. Steven G. Cooperman.

Jeffrey Wilens of Lakeshore Law Center activity need to be exposed, it’s about time to stop the damage inflicted to the US economy by class action lawyers.