Jeffrey Wilens Pretends to Protect the Poor and his brother Gary Wilens works for the offenders

On Jeffrey Wilens‘s law firm Lakeshore Law center website he brags, “Dedicated to fighting fraud, false advertising and abuse by corporations – We stand for the “little guy” (and gal)”

How ironic that Jeffrey Wilens brother Gary Wilens is working for Student Loan Support a Student Loan Repayment company where there is many complaints on the BBB with students being ripped off.

Jeffrey, why don’t you file a class action suit on Student Loan Support Companies and protect all these poor students “the little guys”.

See the BBB complaints here: Gary Wilens Scam BBB complaints

gary wilens Scam BBB complaints

gary wilens BBB scam complaints


Of all the companies Jeffrey Wilens has sued, most of them he’s lost.

Jeffrey Wilens goes after completely legitimate corporations trying to claim some allegedly wacky misconduct, while doing so he terrorizes everyone involved.  In the few cases that he’s settled, he gets his “clients” a measly settlement of around $25 or less usually in the form of a coupon.

Jeffrey Wilens gets the big money while his “clients” the class members “victims” gets nothing.  His “Firm” slogan claims to “Protect the little guy against corporate misconduct.”  How ironic!

litte guy


Examples of the kind of legitimate companies Jeffrey Wilens goes after.

Nordstrom Department Stores
Bank of America
Washington Mutual
Wells Fargo
Verizon Wireless
Delta Airlines
American Express
Enterprise Rent-a-Car
Hertz Rent-a-Car


Lawyers charged in barratry indictments

Two lawyers have been indicted on charges of felony barratry for allegedly soliciting family and friends or paying employees in their office to illegally solicit plaintiffs.

Read More about Barratry Indictments

Hopefully the day will come for Jeffry Wilens Barratry indictment

In the past Jeffrey Wilens advocated for Lawyer Guilty of Insurance Scam Felonies, where by more than 35 people arrested.


Jeffrey Wilens’s latest Class Action lawsuit vs ICON Health & Fitness , Inc

Once again Jeffrey Wilens running out of fake plaintiffs using his own name as a Plaintiff to file a class action lawsuit against corporate America.

Basically Wilens sued them first, signed a release not to sue than sued them again… Does this sound like an ethical lawyer?


Case No.:  30-2015-00786780-CU-BT-CXC (Assigned for  all purposes to the Hon. Thierry Patrick Colaw, Dept. CXJ 05)

Lawyer Wilens is using his long time partner in the scams Jeffrey P. Spencer from THE SPENCER LAW FIRM 903 Calle Amanecer , Suite 220 San Clemente, CA  92673 as his “lawyer”.

On May 11, 2015, Plaintiff Wilens filed a complaint against ICON HEALTH & FITNESS on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated asserting causes of action for Violation of Unfair  Competition  Law  (Business  & Professions  Code  §  17200 et.  Seq.)  and  Violation  of        Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civil Code § 1770 et. seq.). ICON filed a Demurrer and Motion to   Strike on June 11, 2015. Plaintiff Wilens responded with a First Amended Complaint which was     filed on July 2, 2015 asserting the same causes of action. On July 30, 2015 ICON filed a Demurrer  and Motion to Strike to the First Amended Complaint. On September 18, 2015, the Court overruled ICON’s demurrer and denied ICON’s motion to strike .   On October 1, 2015, ICON answered Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint.

On August 8, 2015, Plaintiff Jeffrey Wilens filed a small claims action against ICON Health & Fitness, case number 30-2014-00739980-SC-SC-NJC , claiming ICON damaged Plaintiff Wilens in the amount of $2,205.42 because his “[i]ncline treadmill [was] defective and could not be repaired after several attempts. The Wi-Fi module, a key element for setting the course and tracking        performance does not function, company admits it is defective.” (Undisputed Material Fact       (hereinafter “UMF”.) In order to resolve the claim, ICON sent a letter on October 21, 2014,          indicating that they would settle with Plaintiff Wilens for $2,311.05 in exchange for his execution   of the attached Confidential Release. (UMF 2.) That very same day, Plaintiff Wilens, an active        attorney admitted to practice in the State of California, executed the Confidential Release, emailed the same back to ICON’s counsel, and demanded that the check be overnighted to his office. (See   UMF 3.) The release provided in the first paragraph of a one page release, that the undersigned:     does hereby release and forever discharge ICON

. … (hereafter Released Parties)” …of and from any and all existing or possible actions, causes of action, claims, demands, damages, costs, fees, and expenses of any kind, on account of, or in any way arising from or related to all known and unknown injuries and damages resulting  or which  may  result  from  the  undersigned’s  use  of exercise equipment by the undersigned and sold, displayed and/or manufactured by Released Parties or any of its affiliates.” (UMF 4.)

More to come soon